A urbanidade como devir do urbano - Vol. 39 Núm. 118, Septiembre - Septiembre 2013 - EURE-Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbanos Regionales - Libros y Revistas - VLEX 487208678

A urbanidade como devir do urbano

AutorNetto, V.
CargoUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brasil
233
  0250-7161 |   0717-6236
Recibido el 16 de noviembre de 2011, aprobado el 15 de diciembre de 2012
E-mail: WOOFUUP!ZBIPPDPVL | WOFUUP!WNVĈCS
A urbanidade como devir do urbano
Vinicius M. Netto. Universida de Federal Fluminense, Niterói , Brasil.
 | Poucos conceitos em urbanismo aspiram tocar a condição urbana e a
FYQFSJËODJBEBDJEBEFDPNPPEFiVSCBOJEBEFumFUBMWF[OFOIVNPVUSPUFOIBFODPOUSBEP
VNBEFđOJÉÈPUÈPQPVDPTJTUFNÃUJDB"GBTUBOEPTFEBTEFđOJÉ×FTVTVBJTEBTDPOEJÉ×FT
FTQBDJBJT EB VSCBOJEBEF P QSFTFOUF USBCBM IP QSPQ×F VNB BCPSEBHFN BMUFSOBUJWB BP
UFNBBQBSUJSEBBQSPYJNBÉÈPFOUSFEVBTÃSFBTBJOEBFTUSBOIBTFOUSFTJFTUVEPTVSCBOPT
F B đMPTPđB #VTDBOEP SFDPOI FDFS PT EJGFSFOUFT NPEPT EB FYQFSJËODJB VSCBOB F BT
EJNFOT×FTGFOPNFOPMÓHJDBDPNVOJDBUJWBFPOUPMÓHJDBEBVSCBOJEBEFDPNPVNBUSBNB
EFSFMBÉ×FTFOUSFBUPSFT BUPTFFTQBÉPTPBSUJHPEJTDVUFBTDPOEJÉ×FTEBEJWFSTJEBEFBT
UFOT×FTEFEFTJOUFHSBÉÈPTPDJBMFBTQSPQSJFEBEFTNBUFSJBJTRVFBTTFHVSBSJBNVNQBQFM
QPUFODJBMNFOUFJOUFHSBEPSÆVSCF'JOBMNFOUFQSPQ×FPSFDPOIFDJNFOUPEFEJGFSFOUFT
VSCBOJEBEFTQBVUBEBTQ PSVNFUIPTDPNPSFRVJTJUP BDPFYJTUËODJBEBTGPSNBTEF WJEB
e o bem-vir de alteridades como o devir do urbano numa urbanidade p lena e aberta .
1BMBWSBTDIBWFVSCBOJEBEFEFWJSFYQFSJËODJBVSCBOB
  | cultura urbana, espaço público , urbanidade.
 | Few notions aspire to reach the condition of urban life and experience as that
of “urbanity” – and perhap s no one has done so more imprecisely. Departing om usual
focus on the spatial con ditions of urbanity, the paper brings a potentially esher approach
which draws om disciplines still largely unrelated: philosophy and urban studies. A
series of concepts of urbanity unfold as we explore the experiential, communicative and
ontological conditions of urbanity as a lively fabric of relation s of actors, acts and spaces.
e approach shows the fabric of urbanity cut across by an ethos inherent to forms of l ife
open to an unbounded communication, and aims at a denition which would allow us to
get reconnected with the common sense notion: urbanity as the ethos of an open coexistence,
the orientation to the Other and the becoming of the urban.
  | urban cultura, public space, urbanity.
|  39 |  118 |   2013 | pp. 233-263 |  | ©EURE
234 ©EURE |  39 |  118 |   2013 | pp. 233-263
Início: philo | urbe | sophia
Para Alejandro Jelvez
0FTQBÉPFPUFNQPTÈPBFTUSVUVSBFNRVFUPEBB
SFBMJEBEFFTUÃDPOUJEB%FTDSFWFSFBOBMJTBSPDBSÃUFS
FTQFDÎđDPRVFPFTQBÉPFPUFNQPBTTVNFNOBFYQFSJËODJB
IVNBOBÊVNBEBTUBSFGBTNBJTBUSBFOUFTFJNQPSUBOUFTEF
uma losoa antropológica.
Ernst Cassirer (Ensaio Sobre o Homem)
)ÃNVJUPTRVFSFTJTUFNBVNDFSUPUJQPEFđMPTPđB&MFTB
BDIBNEJGÎDJMEFBQSFDJBSmBCTUSBUBFBQBSFOUFNFOUFTFN
HSBOEFWBMPSQSÃUJDP&MBMIFTQBSFDFVNWBHPFPCTDVSP
OPOTFOTF4FNQSFIPVWFOBTWÃSJBTÊQPDBTEBIJTUÓSJB
IVNBOBQFTTPBTRVFBTTJNQFOTBTTFNmBTTJNDPNP
TFNQSFIPVWFBRVFMFTRVFQFSDFCFTTFNBTSFWFMBÉ×FT
do pensamento especulativo como sendo da maior
JNQPSUÄODJB1
John M. Anderson, Introdução a
Discourse on inking, de Martin Heidegger
 1 | Em busca de uma denição múltipla de urbanidade 2
Poucos conceitos em estudos urbanos aspiram toc ar a condição urbana como o de
iVSCBOJEBEFu5BMWF[OÈPQPSBDBTPQPVDPTPVUSPTFODPOUSBNEFđOJÉ×FTUÈPEJGV-
TBTPVQPVDPTJTUFNÃUJDBT$PODFJUPTDPOIFDJEPTWBSJBNEBWJTÈPEFTFOTPDPNVN
EBVSCBOJEBEFDPNPiDJWJMJEBEFEP DPOWÎWJPuBPGPDPOBT SFMBÉ×FT PCKFUJWBTFOUSF
DPOđHVSBÉ×FTEPFTQBÉPVSCBOPFPVTPEPFTQBÉPQÙCMJDPFÆTDPOEJÉ×FTFTQBDJBJT
EFVNBBQBSFOUFiWJUBMJEBEFVSCBOBu 5BMPCTFSWBÉÈPTVHFSF VNBTÊSJF EFQFSHVO-
UBTTFSJBQPTTÎWFMDBQUVSBSB DPOEJÉÈP VSCBOB 0RVFEJGFSFODJBB FYQFSJËODJB VS-
CBOBEBFYQFSJËODJBEFPVUSBTFTQBDJBMJEBEFTPVBNCJFOUFTOÈPVSCBOPT .BJTBN-
1 iăFSFBSFNBOZXIPSFTJTUBDFSUBJOLJOEPGQIJMPTPQIZăFZđOEJUIBSEUPFOKPZBCTUSBDUBOEBQQBSFOUMZPGOPHSFBU
practical value. It seems to them vague and obscure nonsense. ere have always been such people in the various epochs
PGIVNBOIJTUPSZKVTUBTUIFSFIBWFBMXBZTCFFOUIPTFXIP đOEUIFSFWFMBUJPOTPGTQFDVMBUJWFUIJOLJOHUPCFP GVUNPTU
importance” (Heidegger, 1966). Tradução do autor.
2 *NBHFN QPS WJDUPSJBQFDLIBN TP C MJDFOÉB $SFBUJWF $PNNPOT IUUQXXXĔJDLSDPNQIPUPT
WJDUPSJBQFDLIBNTJ[FT[JOQIPUPTUSFBN

Para continuar leyendo

Solicita tu prueba

VLEX utiliza cookies de inicio de sesión para aportarte una mejor experiencia de navegación. Si haces click en 'Aceptar' o continúas navegando por esta web consideramos que aceptas nuestra política de cookies. ACEPTAR